Statement by Aspiro’s independent bid committee in relation to Project Panther Bidco’s public takeover offer

With reference to Project Panther Bidco Ltd’s public takeover offer for all the
shares in Aspiro AB (publ), the Independent Bid
Committee[1] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014/Malibu
% 
20Tiger/FINAL/Aspiro%20-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftn1)
within Aspiro’s board of directors has decided, as further set out below, to
unanimously recommend all shareholders of Aspiro to accept the offer.
Furthermore, in connection with the offer, the Independent Bid Committee decided
to bring forward the date of publication of Aspiro’s year-end report for 2014
from 12 February 2015 to 5 February 2015.

[1] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014/Malibu%20Tiger/
F 
INAL/Aspiro%20-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftnref1)
Defined below.
Background

This statement is made by the Independent Bid
Committee[1] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014/Malibu
% 
20Tiger/FINAL/Aspiro%20-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftn1)
of Aspiro AB (publ) ("Aspiro" or the "Company") pursuant to section II.19 of the
Rules concerning Public Takeover Offers on the Stock Market adopted by Nasdaq
Stockholm (the "Takeover Rules").

On 30 January 2015, Project Panther Bidco Ltd ("Panther"), indirectly owned by
S. Carter Enterprises, LLC (“SCE”), has, through a press release, announced a
public offer to the shareholders of Aspiro to tender all shares in the Company
to Panther for a consideration of SEK 1.05 per share in Aspiro (the
"Offer").[2] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014/Malibu
% 
20Tiger/FINAL/Aspiro%20-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftn2)

Based on Aspiro's closing share price of SEK 0.66 as of 29 January 2015, the
Offer values each Aspiro share at SEK 1.05 and the total value of the Offer at
approximately
SEK 464 million.[3] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014
/ 
Malibu%20Tiger/FINAL/Aspiro%20
-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftn3) The Offer represents a
premium of:

  · 59.1 per cent for each Aspiro share compared to the closing price on 29
January 2015, the last trading day prior to the announcement, of SEK 0.66; and
  · 58.7 per cent for each Aspiro share compared to the volume-weighted average
trading prices over the last 90 calendar days ending on 29 January 2015 of
SEK 0.66.

The acceptance period for the Offer is expected to commence on or about
19 February 2015 and expire on or about 11 March 2015. Commencement of
settlement is expected to begin approximately one week after the expiry of the
acceptance period. The Offer is, inter alia, conditional upon that it is
accepted to the extent that Panther becomes the owner of more than 90 per cent
of the total number of shares in Aspiro and that Panther receives the necessary
regulatory approvals for the acquisition.

The board of directors of Aspiro received an indication of interest from SCE on
3 December 2014, and following negotiations, on 13 December 2014, SCE was
permitted to initiate a due diligence in connection with the preparations
pertaining to the Offer. Apart from limited unaudited financial information from
Aspiro’s year-end report for 2014, no information which could reasonably be
deemed as price sensitive for the shares of Aspiro has been disclosed to SCE or
Panther during the due diligence process. The Independent Bid Committee has, due
to SCE having reviewed the unaudited financial information, resolved to bring
forward the date of publication of Aspiro’s year-end report for 2014 from 12
February 2015 to 5 February 2015, which will also be included in the offer
document to be published by Panther. The date of publication for the offer
document is expected to or around 17 February 2015.

According to today’s press release by Panther, on 30 January 2015, Streaming
Media AS, which holds approximately 75.9 per cent of the shares and votes in
Aspiro, has through an agreement with Panther, subject only to Panther complying
in all material respects with the Takeover Rules and good stock market practice
in Sweden, irrevocably and unconditionally committed to accept the Offer.

The members of the board of directors Trond Berger (chairman of the board of
directors) and Rolf Kristian Presthus have, due to closely related parties’
undertakings of accepting the Offer, not participated in the preparation of, or
the decision pertaining to, the statement of the board of directors in relation
to the Offer. Instead, these measures have been taken on behalf of the board of
directors by a bid committee consisting of the independent board members Fredrik
Bjørland (chairman of the committee), Johan Forsberg and Taina Malén (the
“Independent Bid Committee”). The Independent Bid Committee constitutes a
quorate board for
Aspiro.[4] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014/Malibu%2
0 
Tiger/FINAL/Aspiro%20-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftn4)

Fairness opinion

The Independent Bid Committee has, in support of its statement, resolved to
obtain a fairness opinion from an independent third party.

The Independent Bid Committee has engaged ABG Sundal Collier (“ABG”) to provide
a fairness opinion as to the fairness of the Offer price from a financial point
of view to the shareholders of Aspiro. According to the fairness opinion, which
has been attached to this press release and made available at www.Aspiro.com,
ABG is of the opinion that the Offer, subject to the terms and conditions as set
out in the opinion, is fair from a financial point of view to the shareholders
of Aspiro.

The Independent Bid Committee’s recommendation

In accordance with the Takeover Rules, the board of directors of Aspiro shall
publish its opinion on the Offer and its reasons for such opinion. The following
statement is therefore made by the Independent Bid Committee within the board of
directors of Aspiro:

In assessing the Offer, the Independent Bid Committee has taken into account a
number of factors considered relevant. These factors include, but are not
limited to, Aspiro’s current financial position, expected future development and
potential and related opportunities and challenges. The Independent Bid
Committee has also analysed the Offer using the methods normally used for
evaluating offers for listed companies, including the bid premium in relation to
the share price, Aspiro’s valuation in relation to comparable listed companies
and comparable acquisitions, the short and long-term consequences for the
Company to remain in a publicly listed environment, the stock market’s
expectation of the development of Aspiro’s profitability and share price, as
well as the board of directors’ expectation of Aspiro’s long-term value based on
expected future cash flows. In its evaluation of the Offer, the Independent Bid
Committee has also taken into account that shareholders representing
approximately 75.9 per cent of the shares have entered into an irrevocable
undertaking to accept the Offer, subject only to Panther complying in all
material respects with the Takeover Rules and good stock market practice in
Sweden in connection with the Offer launch.

For some time, the board of directors of Aspiro has worked with the need of
securing the requisite funding in order to implement the comprehensive strategic
plan for the Company as approved by the board of directors. Due to the Company’s
need to strengthen its capital structure, a rights issue to the shareholders of
Aspiro, which provided Aspiro with approximately SEK 60 million after issue
expenses, was resolved on in the spring of 2014 and effected in June 2014. The
funding enabled the Company’s expansion to, inter alia, the UK and the US under
the brand name TIDAL. In the rights issue prospectus, the board of directors
also expressed the potential need of meeting future capital requirements by
other means. During the autumn of 2014, Aspiro engaged the financial advisor
Mooreland Partners LLP to further investigate the possibility of alternative
solutions in order for the Company to realise its strategic plans and potential,
thereby securing the Company’s value to the benefit of its shareholders.

After having reviewed the Offer and the Offer documentation in connection
therewith, the Independent Bid Committee is of the opinion that Panther,
indirectly owned by SCE and controlled by Shawn Carter, possesses the
proprietary relationships, industry knowledge, as well as economic strength and
the necessary commitment in order to realise Aspiro’s strategic plan of
expanding the Company’s business and brand globally.

Under the Takeover Rules, the board of directors is also required, based on what
Panther has stated in its announcement of the Offer, to present its views on the
impact that the completion of the Offer may have on Aspiro and its views on
Panther’s strategic plans for Aspiro and the impact that such could be expected
to have on employment and on the locations where Aspiro conducts its business.
The Independent Bid Committee notes that in the press release announcing the
Offer, Panther states that its indirect owner SCE holds interests in leading
international music, media and entertainment companies and believes that
significant opportunities exist to further develop Aspiro in a focused private
environment outside of the stock exchange where Panther, as an active owner with
significant resources for expansion, further technology investment and strong
industrial and content production networks, can provide long-term support for
the management and the business that is needed in order to capture and fully
capitalise on the opportunities that lie ahead. Panther does currently not
foresee any material changes to the management and employees or their terms of
employment. In light of the foregoing, the Independent Bid Committee does not
foresee any negative effects on either employment or the locations where Aspiro
conducts business.

In summary:

  · The Offer from Panther is launched following a structured and diligent
process conducted by Aspiro, in which a number of strategic options have been
identified and evaluated;
  · Panther is deemed to possess the capacity to develop the Company in a
privately owned environment, based on SCE’s intricate position in the industry
and its financial capabilities;
  · The Offer represents a premium of 58.7 per cent compared to the volume
-weighted average share price for the Company’s share during the last three
months;
  · Significant shareholders, representing approximately 75.9 per cent of the
shares in Aspiro, have entered into a binding and irrevocable undertaking with
Panther to accept the Offer, subject only to Panther complying in all material
respects with the Takeover Rules and good stock market practice in Sweden in
connection with the Offer launch; and
  · The conclusion made by the independent advisor ABG in the so-called fairness
opinion is that the Offer is fair from a financial point of view.

In light of the above, the Independent Bid Committee within the board of
directors unanimously recommends all shareholders in Aspiro to accept Panther’s
Offer of SEK 1.05 per share in Aspiro.

Upon reading this recommendation, it should be noted that Aspiro entered into an
agreement with SCE dated 13 December 2014 whereby the board of directors
undertook to refrain from actively soliciting offers from third parties during
the period in which SCE performed its due diligence. As SCE reconfirmed its
continued interest, the agreed exclusivity has been prolonged and will expire on
31 January 2015. The board of directors found it warranted to enter into this
undertaking due to the short duration of the undertaking, the seriousness of the
offeror, as well as the board of directors’ sounding of the market during the
autumn of 2014. The exclusivity did not prevent the board of directors from
negotiating with parties that had not been actively solicited by the board of
directors. SCE and Panther have during the same period been prohibited from
taking any action that could limit the Company’s business and from entering into
any contract to acquire shares in Aspiro before the formal launch of a public
takeover offer.

Remuneration to senior management in connection with the Offer

As mentioned above, Aspiro’s board of directors chose, during the autumn of
2014, to engage Mooreland Partners LLP to examine alternative solutions to
realise the Company’s strategic plans and potential, in order to thereby ensure
shareholder value. Due to the increased work load that necessitated in
conjunction with discussions with potential investors as well as the importance
of the senior management for Aspiro’s long-term expansion plans, the board of
directors chose to establish and implement specific incentives to retain top
management as employees of the Company regardless of a change of majority
shareholder in Aspiro. Aspiro’s board of directors has therefore decided on the
following transaction-related remuneration to the top management (based on the
Offer price less advisor fees), which applies to the Chief Executive Officer
Andy Chen, Chief Financial Officer Christopher Hart, Chief Commercial Officer
Peter Tonstad and Chief Technical Officer Rune Lending, consisting of cash
remuneration payable upon completion of the Offer and in case each provided the
manager has remained employed in the same position (excluding social security
contributions and based on estimated final advisor fees in the anticipated
transaction):

Andy Chen, CEO: approximately SEK 3 million

Other management: approximately SEK 3.3 million

An increased price per share of the Offer price of SEK 1.05 would entail
proportionally increased remuneration, where the CEO and remaining management
would stand to receive 2.9 per cent and 3.33 per cent (altogether) respectively
of the value of an increased offer, however with an overall cap of all
aggregated remuneration to senior management being set to SEK 30 million
(excluding social security contributions).

The payment of remuneration is conditional upon, inter alia, that a change in
majority owner occurs, that each respective manager has used his or her best
efforts to ensure the transaction is executed on the best possible terms for
Aspiro and its shareholders, and that the manager remains in his or her position
for at least six months following the transaction.

It is the board of directors’ assessment that the transaction related
remuneration is not covered by the strict wording of the remuneration principles
for senior management adopted by the annual general meeting 2014. The board of
directors is however of the opinion that the remuneration is in accordance with
the purpose of the principles and that the deviation from the principles is
justified due to the extensive burden assumed by senior management in
conjunction with the Offer as well as the management’s strategic importance for
the launch of the Offer. Furthermore, the maximum aggregated remuneration is,
even if aggregated with the transaction-related remuneration, within the overall
cap stipulated in the principles for remuneration to the senior management
adopted by the annual general meeting 2014.

Advisors

The board of directors of Aspiro has appointed Mooreland Partners LLP as its
financial advisor and Vinge as its legal advisor on matters relating to the
Offer. ABG Sundal Collier has been engaged to issue a fairness opinion in
relation to the Offer.

Malmö, 30 January 2015

Aspiro AB (publ)

The board of directors, through the Independent Bid Committee

Aspiro AB discloses the information provided herein pursuant to the Financial
Instruments Trading Act and/or the Securities Markets Act and the Takeover
Rules. The information was submitted for publication at 8:00 am CET on 30
January 2015. This statement shall in all aspects be governed by and interpreted
in accordance with Swedish law. Any disputes relating to or arising in
connection with this statement shall be settled exclusively by Swedish courts.

For futher information:

Fredrik Bjørland, chairman of the Independent Bid Committee, Phone number +47 95
20 18 50, E-mail fredrik.bjorland @ ferd.no

Conference call

The Independent Bid Committee will also host a conference call to answer
questions relating to the Offer.

Time: 30 January 2015 at 2:00 pm CET

Phone number: +46 (0) 8 505 59 840

PIN: #357596

Aspiro in brief

Aspiro is a media technology company on the forefront in the ongoing
redefinition of music consumption. Through its subscription service WiMP, the
company offers a complete music experience with HiFi quality audio and
integrated editorial, magazine and video. In parallel, Aspiro is a content
provider to the online media industry through RADR, helping its partners to
attract and retain visitors on their web sites. For more information, please
visit www.aspiro.com.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014/Malibu%20Tiger/
F 
INAL/Aspiro%20-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftnref1)
Defined below.

[2] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014/Malibu%20Tiger/
F 
INAL/Aspiro%20-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftnref2)Aspiro
has issued warrants, which after re-calculation amount to 17,465,067. However,
as all those warrants are held by the wholly-owned subsidiary Aspiro Innovation
AB, they are excluded from the Offer in accordance with section II.12 of the
Takeover Rules.

[3] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014/Malibu%20Tiger/
F 
INAL/Aspiro%20-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftnref3) Based
on an aggregate of 441,985,748 outstanding shares in Aspiro.

[4] (http://file///C:/Users/Kristin/Google%20Drive/Aspiro%202014/Malibu%20Tiger/
F 
INAL/Aspiro%20-%20Press%20release%2030%20Jan%202015%20(Eng).DOCX#_ftnref4) Trond
Berger and Rolf Kristian Presthus are members of the board of directors of
Streaming Media AS although due to the fact that Streaming Media AS entered into
an irrevocable agreement to sell its share holdings in Aspiro in the Offer such
persons have a conflict of interest. The board of directors is however still a
quorate board in relation to questions relating to the Offer without the two
conflicted board members due to the fact that three out of five board members
are duly authorised to participate in the board of directors’ deliberations and
resolutions relating to the Offer.