Contact Information: CONTACT INFORMATION: David Richardson 919-433-0216
Patient Recruitment Is Largest Roadblock in Clinical Trials, Says Cutting Edge Information
| Source: Cutting Edge Information
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC--(Marketwire - April 14, 2009) - Finding patients for clinical
trials is the toughest part of the long, expensive path to new drug
development.
According to "Streamlining Clinical Trials," a study by Cutting Edge
Information, patient recruitment is the largest factor in increasing
clinical trial costs. Its share of total clinical development time has
increased to 23% of the timeline. More alarming, two thirds of companies
indicate that this percentage continues to increase despite efforts to
reduce patient recruitment delays.
Drug developers wrestle with ways to streamline the clinical trials
process. According to the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development,
clinical trials now comprise 60% of total development costs, up from 30% in
the 1980s. Emerging means for screening potential patients, such as
genetic tests, mean that companies must plan for higher lab-testing costs
and a lower rate of prospective patient enrollment. And the Canadian
Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) in February published an article
claiming that drug development costs had increased at a rate 7.4% higher
than inflation.
According to CMAJ, pharmaceutical companies are increasing their
outsourcing, especially to countries with fewer regulatory delays in the
trial approval process. Electronic data capture systems and the use of
surrogate endpoints in Phase II trials are also being explored by some
companies as a means for accelerating studies.
The data in "Streamlining Clinical Trials," however, show that patient
recruitment remains the largest roadblock to faster, cheaper studies.
"In the past, patient recruitment improvement has focused on making
sponsors and trials more accessible and convenient for patients," says
David Richardson, leader writer for the report. "More recently, companies
have been deploying web-based recruitment, including informational trial
websites."
These improvements have helped, says Richardson, but they do not address
new challenges in patient recruitment.
"Increasingly, problems stem from increased competition for patients and
regulatory policies than from poor marketing or site selection."
The report covers resource allocation, performance measurement, continuous
process improvement, patient and investigator recruitment and adaptive
trial designs. Data include clinical development budgets, clinical
operations team structures and staffing levels, performance measurement and
management, clinical operations hurdles and process improvement tools and
tactics. CEI also draws comparisons to its 2006 and 2004 studies to show
clinical development trends.
A complimentary brochure for the report is available for download at
http://cuttingedgeinfo.com/clinicaltrialbenchmarking/index.htm#body