NEW YORK, Aug. 10, 2009 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C. announces that a lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Conseco Inc. ("Conseco" or the "Company") (NYSE:CNO) common stock during the period between August 4, 2005 to March 17, 2008 (the "Class Period") for violations of the federal securities laws.
No class has yet been certified in the above action. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. If you purchased Conseco common stock during the Class Period, and wish to move the court for appointment of lead plaintiff, you must do so by October 5, 2009. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in the Company during the Class Period. You do not need to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff in order to share in any recovery.
To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time, and you may retain counsel of your choice. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Sue Lee at The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C. 29 Broadway, Suite 2400, New York, New York 10006, by telephone toll free at (877) 495-1187 or (212) 952-0602, by email to slee@brualdilawfirm.com or visit our website at http://www.brualdilawfirm.com.
The Complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, defendants issued numerous statements regarding the Company's financial performance. As alleged in the complaint, these statements were materially false and misleading because defendants misrepresented and/or failed to disclose the following adverse facts, among others: (i) that the Company was reporting materially inaccurate revenue figures; (ii) that the Company's reported financial results were materially misstated and did not present the true operating performance of the Company; (iii) that the Company's shareholders' equity was materially overstated during the Class Period, including the overstatement of shareholders' equity by $20.6 million at December 31, 2006; and (iv) as a result of the foregoing, defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about the Company, its corporate governance practices, its prospects and earnings growth.