Contact Information: CONTACT: Stephanie Swanson (919) 433-0212
Cutting Edge Information Uncovers Major Division Between Clinical Investigator Compensation Budgets and Actual Costs
| Source: Cutting Edge Information
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC--(Marketwire - January 12, 2010) - A recent study by Cutting Edge
Information focusing on compensation levels for clinical investigators
reveals a potential opportunity for sponsors to reduce costs.
The report, "Managing Clinical Investigator Compensation,"
(http://www.cuttingedgeinfo.com/investigator-compensation/) shows that
during Phase 3b development, surveyed companies budget an average of
$32,513 for principal investigator compensation. Yet investigators receive
an average of only $13,436 for running a Phase 3b study, 59% less than
budgeted.
The significant differences between these amounts -- what's budgeted and
what's received -- emphasize cost-saving opportunities for drug and device
manufacturers. Benchmarks based on Cutting Edge Information's research
validate the notion that sponsors have more negotiating room with CROs and
other sites than they may have previously believed.
The biggest concern in investigator compensation, however, may be mounting
public scrutiny. Drug companies are already facing a public relations
scenario in which payments to physicians for promotional or educational
activities have come under frequent fire.
Still, oversight may be inevitable, according to many industry
stakeholders. In an environment of ever-tightening regulation and
oversight, companies need to be proactive in employing processes seeking to
protect them against future regulatory scrutiny. This situation presents
companies with an entirely new set of challenges.
For example, relationships between investigators and companies can take
many forms, including contact through investigator-initiated trials, CROs
and academic institutions. Trying to address these nuances is a challenge.
To protect themselves, companies are considering a fair-market value (FMV)
approach to investigator compensation.
"Through our research, we found teams thinking of applying FMV protocol to
the clinical side," said Jordan Stone, senior research analyst and lead
author of the report. "Determining a market price for investigators based
on a set of criteria both holds down costs and eliminates the risk of
future investigation."
Cutting Edge Information's clinical development report, "Managing Clinical
Investigator Compensation," takes an in-depth look at ways to improve the
cost effectiveness of investigator compensation while ensuring compliance.
The report is developed from surveys from over 50 companies across 13
different therapeutic areas. It includes compensation data collected from
clinical investigators as well as pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical
device companies. A complimentary report brochure is available for
download at
http://www.cuttingedgeinfo.com/investigator-compensation/?download.