Post-tax NPV5% of US$110.4 million and IRR of 34.0%
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Aug. 27, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Otis Gold Corp. (“Otis” or the “Company”) (TSX-V: OOO) (OTC: OGLDF) is pleased to announce that further to its news release dated July 30, 2019, the Company has filed on SEDAR a National Instrument (“NI”) 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment (or “PEA”) for the Kilgore volcanic- and sediment-hosted epithermal gold deposit, Clark County, Idaho.
The PEA as filed contains an amendment of the PEA findings released on July 30, 2019, arising from the deepening of the main pit design to allow for the extraction of additional mineralized material, as well as a change to depreciation by more fully depreciating the pre-tax capital over the mine life. The amendments, which are summarized below, have enhanced both the NPV and IRR of the project, reduced the payback period, increased the mine life and total recovered gold and reduced operating cash costs and all-in sustaining costs per ounce.
PEA Highlights
- After-tax NPV (5% discount rate) of US$110.4 million and IRR of 34.0 %, with a 3.0-year payback period and LOM net cash flow of US$151.8 million;
- Pre-tax NPV (5 % discount rate) of US$144.0 million and IRR of 40.6%;
- Total amount of gold recovered is estimated at 558,700 ounces;
- Average annual gold production of approximately 111,700 ounces;
- Peak annual gold production of approximately 119,600 ounces in year 1;
- Mine life of 5.0 years with a 1-year preproduction period;
- Average crushed material gold grade of 0.72 g/T (grams per Tonne) and average ROM gold grade of 0.24 g/T;
- Low LOM strip ratio of 1.1:1;
- Royalties – 0%;
- LOM direct operating cash cost1 is estimated at US$780/oz of gold recovered and average LOM all-in sustaining cost (or “AISC”2) is estimated at US$832/oz of gold recovered;
- Pre-production initial capital cost estimated at $US81.23 million, using contract mining; and
- LOM capital costs estimated at US$97.5 million.
1 Cash cost includes mining cost, mine-level general and administrative, leaching, and refining cost.
2 All-in sustaining cost (AISC) includes cash cost per ounce, sustaining capital and closure costs.
Otis President & CEO, Craig Lindsay, states: “This PEA marks an important milestone in Kilgore’s development, and we are encouraged to the enhancements in the project’s economics. We now have an important road marker outlining where the deposit stands from an economic perspective, and we expect to see a continuous improvement as the deposit evolves. Indeed, the most exciting feature of Kilgore is what lies ahead in terms of the potential to grow the deposit, find new deposits and significantly enhance the life of the project. Our focus going forward will be about growth via the drill bit.”
The economic model assumes a gold price of US$1,300/ounce. All currency figures stated herein are United States dollars unless otherwise noted.
The Technical Report, entitled “Independent Technical Report and Preliminary Economic Assessment, Kilgore Project, Clark County, Idaho, U.S.A.”, has an effective date of July 30, 2019 and is available under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com and the Company’s website at www.otisgold.com. The PEA was authored by Global Resource Engineering, Ltd. of Denver, Colorado.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty that the PEA results will be realized. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
PEA Overview
The Kilgore deposit is interpreted as a low sulfidation epithermal deposit associated with caldera-related volcanic and intrusive activity. The current defined resource area is a zone of mineralization approximately 800 metres long, 600 metres wide, and 325 metres deep from ground surface to the maximum inferred mineral resource depth. Mineralized intercepts in the deposit generally average 40 metres (130 feet) and range up to 100 metres (330 feet) in thickness.
The PEA envisions recovery of gold from crushed and run-of-mine mineralized material using a heap leach facility. The pregnant leach solution from the heap leach would be collected in a dedicated pond and either recirculated or processed in the Adsorption-Desorption-Recovery (ADR) plant. The gold in the solution would be collected on activated carbon in a series of carbon-in-column (CIC) vessels. Gold recovery would take place through stripping the activated carbon into an enriched solution that reports to an electrowinning circuit. The gold would then be recovered as a sludge that would ultimately be smelted into high purity doré bars. Important project metrics are presented in the following tables.
Table 1: Summary Project Metrics
| Assumptions | |
| Gold Price | $1,300/oz |
| Production Profile | |
| Total Leach Tons Mined | 54.0 million |
| Total Waste Tons Mined | 60.0 million |
| Head Grade - Crushed | 0.72 g/T (0.02 opt) |
| Head Grade - ROM | 0.24 g/T (0.007 opt) |
| Mine Life | 5.0 years |
| Tons per Day Mined - Crushed | 15,000 tons per day |
| Tons per Day Mined - ROM | 15,300 tons per day |
| Strip Ratio (Waste: Mineralized Material) | 1.1:1 |
| Average Gold Recovery – Crushed / ROM | 82% / 50% |
| Total Gold Ounces Mined | 752,200 |
| Total Gold Ounces Recovered | 558,700 |
| Average Annual Gold Production | 111,700 oz |
| Peak Annual Gold Production | 119,600 oz in year 1 |
| Unit Operating Costs | |
| Total Operating Cash Costs | $780/oz |
| All-In Sustaining Cost | $832/oz |
| Key Economic Measurements | |
| Royalties | 0% |
| Pre-tax NPV5%/ After-tax NPV5% | $144.0 million/$110.4 million |
| Pre-tax IRR/ After-tax IRR | 40.6%/34.0% |
| Undiscounted Operating Pre-tax Cash Flow/ After-tax Cash Flow | $193.3 million/$151.8 million |
| After-tax Payback Period | 3.0 years |
The total estimated capital costs for the project, including contingency, are $97.5 million, with initial capital costs of $81.0 million, as shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Summary of Kilgore Capital Costs (millions)
| Capital Cost Item | Year -1 | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Year 6 | Year 7 | Year 8 | Total | |||||||||
| Total Mine Capital Costs | $3.90 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $3.90 | |||||||||
| Total Process Capital Costs | $41.12 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $7.87 | $0.00 | $6.03 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $55.03 | |||||||||
| G&A Capital Costs1,2 | $7.21 | $1.52 | $1.52 | $1.52 | $1.52 | $1.42 | $5.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $19.71 | |||||||||
| Working Capital | $15.46 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ($15.46) | $0.00 | |||||||||
| Contingency | $13.54 | $0.30 | $0.30 | $1.88 | $0.30 | $1.49 | $1.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $18.82 | |||||||||
| Total Capital Costs | $81.23 | $1.52 | $1.52 | $11.27 | $1.52 | $8.94 | $6.00 | $0.00 | ($15.46) | $97.46 | |||||||||
1 Includes reclamation bond and closure costs.
2 Includes sustaining capital.
Mining Method
The PEA study utilizes open-pit mining with mine planning based on economic pit shells generated by mine planning software. Mine production is planned at approximately 30,000 tons per day or 11.1 million tons per year of leach feed (mineralized) material. With an average waste-to-leach-feed-material strip ratio of 1.1 to 1, the average mining rate is approximately 61,500 tons per day of leach feed and waste material. The open-pit mining at Kilgore was designed utilizing contract mining.
Table 3: Mining Schedule
| Parameter | Year -1 | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Total2 |
| Crush Tons (Mt1) | 0.02 | 5.48 | 5.52 | 5.48 | 5.48 | 5.12 | 27.1 |
| ROM Tons (Mt) | 0.14 | 6.14 | 4.7 | 9.05 | 5.23 | 1.70 | 27.0 |
| Total Leach Material (Mt) | 0.16 | 11.6 | 10.22 | 14.53 | 10.71 | 6.82 | 54.0 |
| Waste Tons (Mt) | 0.89 | 7.88 | 14.37 | 22.52 | 7.75 | 6.54 | 59.95 |
| Total Material Moved (Mt) | 1.05 | 19.48 | 24.59 | 37.05 | 18.46 | 13.36 | 113.95 |
| Au Ounces - Crush (Koz3) | 0.3 | 120.4 | 117.5 | 99.0 | 112.1 | 121.4 | 570.7 |
| Au Grade (opt) - Crush | 0.014 | 0.022 | 0.021 | 0.018 | 0.020 | 0.024 | 0.021 |
| Au grade (g/t) - Crush | 0.48 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.72 |
| Au Ounces - ROM (Koz) | 0.8 | 40.9 | 31.8 | 60.1 | 36.0 | 11.8 | 181.5 |
| Au Grade (opt) – ROM | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Au grade (g/t) – ROM | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
1million ton 2numbers may not add due to rounding 3thousands ounces
Recovery Methods
A conventional heap leach process is best suited for the Kilgore deposit; higher grade material would be crushed prior to being placed on the heap and the rest would be treated directly as run-of-mine (ROM). Mined material with a cut-off grade greater than 0.01 opt (>0.34 g/T) would be crushed to ½ inch to improve gold recovery as indicated by metallurgical testing; grades between 0.004 opt (>0.15 g/T) and 0.01opt (<0.34 g/T) would go straight to the leach pad as ROM material. All material placed on the pad would have lime added prior to pad placement for pH control. The ROM material would be trucked and dumped on the pad and ripped with a dozer after each lift is complete. The crushed material would be conveyed/stacked on the heap leach facility (HLF). The pregnant leach solution from the heap leach would be collected in a dedicated pond and either recirculated or processed in the Adsorption-Desorption-Recovery (ADR) plant. The gold in the solution would be collected on activated carbon in a series of carbon-in-column (CIC) vessels. Gold recovery would take place through stripping the activated carbon into an enriched solution that reports to an electrowinning circuit where the gold would be recovered as a sludge that is ultimately smelted into high purity doré bars.
Operating Costs
The total life of mine operating costs are estimated to be $423.7 million. Average LOM unit costs for mining, processing and G&A are $2.29/mined ton, $2.89/process ton, $0.51/process ton respectively (annual estimates are shown in Table 4 and Table 5).
Table 4: Summary of Kilgore Estimated Operating Costs (millions)
| Operating Cost Item | Year -1 | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Total | |||||||
| Total Mine Operating Costs | $1.95 | $43.71 | $47.14 | $81.65 | $54.86 | $35.68 | $264.99 | |||||||
| Total Process Operating Costs | $0.08 | $33.12 | $30.41 | $37.90 | $31.31 | $24.01 | $156.83 | |||||||
| Total G&A Operating Costs | $0.15 | $2.76 | $2.76 | $2.76 | $2.76 | $2.58 | $13.77 | |||||||
| Total Operating Costs | $2.18 | $79.59 | $80.31 | $122.31 | $88.93 | $62.26 | $435.57 | |||||||
1 Includes extraction of both mineralized material and waste rock.
Table 5: Summary of Kilgore Estimated Operating Unit Costs
| Item | Year -1 | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Avg LOM Total | ||||||||
| Mine | ($/mined ton) | $1.86 | $2.24 | $1.92 | $2.20 | $2.97 | $2.67 | $2.32 | |||||||
| Process | ($/process ton) | $3.73 | $2.85 | $2.97 | $2.61 | $2.92 | $3.52 | $2.90 | |||||||
| G&A | ($/crushed ton) | $0.47 | $0.54 | $0.38 | $0.51 | $0.76 | $0.51 | ||||||||
Table 6: Costs per Gold Ounce
| Item | Avg LOM Total | |
| Cash Operating Cost / Au ounce1 | $780 | |
| All-in Sustaining Cost / Au ounce2 | $832 | |
1 Total operating cash cost per ounce recovered = (operating costs)/Au ounces recovered).
2 All-in Sustaining Cost / Au ounce = (cash operating costs plus capital costs less initial capital)/Au ounces.
The Kilgore deposit includes potentially recoverable silver as well as gold. Silver assays were conducted on approximately 3,906 samples, however, they were not incorporated into the block model, and therefore the Mineral Resource Estimate of August, 2018 did not address silver. Silver has not been included in the PEA as there is insufficient data to support a silver resource model at this time; silver would be recovered during the heap leach process and ultimately form part of the doré.
PEA Sensitivities
The PEA examines the effect on NPV5% of up to a 20% increase or decrease in capital (Capex) and operating (Opex) expenditures. NPV5% is most strongly influenced by the price of gold.
The following tables show the change in NPV5% over a range of Opex, Capex and gold prices. The optimum case using factors of 100% for operating and capital expenditures, and a gold price of $1,300 oz is shaded grey.
Table 7: NPV5% Sensitivity to Opex, Capex and Gold Price
| NPV5% in $M | Opex | |||||
| -20.0% | -10% | 0.0% | 10.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Capex | -20.0% | 186.6 | 157.4 | 128.2 | 97.5 | 69.2 |
| -10.0% | 178.1 | 148.9 | 119.4 | 88.4 | 60.0 | |
| 0.0% | 169.3 | 140.0 | 110.4 | 79.0 | 50.3 | |
| 10.0% | 160.3 | 131.1 | 101.1 | 69.3 | 40.2 | |
| 20.0% | 151.0 | 121.8 | 91.6 | 59.1 | 29.9 | |
| NPV5% in $M | Gold Price/oz | |||||
| $900 | $1,100 | $1,300 | $1,500 | $1,700 | ||
| Capex | -20.0% | (8.1) | 51.6 | 128.2 | 202.8 | 276.4 |
| -10.0% | (17.8) | 42.2 | 119.4 | 194.3 | 268.0 | |
| 0.0% | (27.8) | 32.4 | 110.4 | 185.5 | 259.5 | |
| 10.0% | (38.1) | 22.3 | 101.1 | 176.5 | 250.7 | |
| 20.0% | (48.7) | 11.9 | 91.6 | 167.2 | 241.6 | |
| NPV5% in $M | Gold Price/oz | |||||
| $900 | $1,100 | $1,300 | $1,500 | $1,700 | ||
| Opex | -20.0% | 14.4 | 94.5 | 169.3 | 242.1 | 313.3 |
| -10.0% | (10.4) | 63.5 | 140.1 | 214.6 | 286.6 | |
| 0.0% | (27.8) | 32.4 | 110.4 | 185.5 | 259.5 | |
| 10.0% | (45.9) | 7.8 | 79.0 | 156.3 | 230.9 | |
| 20.0% | (57.1) | (9.5) | 50.3 | 126.3 | 201.7 | |
The following tables show the effect of Capex, Opex and Gold Price on IRR.
Table 8: IRR Sensitivity to Capex, Opex and Gold Price
| Post-tax IRR in % | Opex | |||||
| -20.0% | -10.0% | 0.0% | 10.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Capex | -20.0% | 63.5 | 53.6 | 43.8 | 33.9 | 24.6 |
| -10.0% | 56.8 | 47.7 | 38.6 | 29.4 | 20.9 | |
| 0.0% | 50.8 | 42.4 | 34.0 | 25.4 | 17.5 | |
| 10.0% | 45.6 | 37.8 | 30.0 | 21.8 | 14.4 | |
| 20.0% | 40.9 | 33.7 | 26.3 | 18.5 | 11.6 | |
| Post-tax IRR in % | Gold Price/oz | |||||
| $900 | $1,100 | $1,300 | $1,500 | $1,700 | ||
| Capex | -20.0% | 2.6 | 20.4 | 43.8 | 66.2 | 87.3 |
| -10.0% | (0.0) | 16.7 | 38.6 | 59.3 | 78.8 | |
| 0.0% | (2.4) | 13.4 | 34.0 | 53.3 | 71.5 | |
| 10.0% | (4.6) | 10.5 | 30.0 | 48.0 | 65.1 | |
| 20.0% | (6.6) | 7.8 | 26.3 | 43.3 | 59.4 | |
| Post-tax IRR in % | Gold Price/oz | |||||
| $900 | $1,100 | $1,300 | $1,500 | $1,700 | ||
| Opex | -20.0% | 9.0 | 31.0 | 50.8 | 69.0 | 86.1 |
| -10.0% | 2.2 | 22.2 | 42.4 | 61.4 | 78.8 | |
| 0.0% | (2.4) | 13.4 | 34.0 | 53.3 | 71.5 | |
| 10.0% | (7.2) | 7.0 | 25.4 | 45.1 | 63.7 | |
| 20.0% | (10.0) | 2.6 | 17.5 | 36.9 | 55.6 | |
The following table illustrates the effect of gold price and discount rate on NPV.
Table 9: NPV5% Sensitivity to Gold Price
| NPV5% in $M | Discount Rate | |||||
| 0.0% | 5.0% | 7.0% | 9.0% | |||
| Gold Prices USD / oz | $900 | (13.9) | (27.8) | (33.2) | (37.9) | |
| $1,100 | 50.9 | 32.4 | 23.2 | 15.1 | ||
| $1,300 | 151.8 | 110.4 | 96.8 | 84.6 | ||
| $1,500 | 239.7 | 185.5 | 167.6 | 151.4 | ||
| $1,700 | 326.3 | 259.5 | 237.3 | 217.3 | ||
Project Enhancement Opportunities
The PEA demonstrates the potential economic viability of the Kilgore project and also outlines a number of opportunities for project enhancement:
- Continue drill testing the near surface potential of the deposit by drilling to north, south, and west where it remains open including fracture / fault studies to better define the relationship between mineralization and structure, and oriented and geotechnical drilling to assist in mine design studies. This will be followed by an updated resource estimate.
- Optimization of the mine plan - the PEA represents the first step toward addressing the viability of a mining operation at Kilgore. Further work may identify opportunities for cost saving, such as waste-haul optimization and improved pit sequencing through pit phasing.
- Metallurgy - work is currently under way on drill core from areas not previously tested. Ongoing metallurgical test work is critical in ensuring that process design is the most appropriate for the Kilgore Deposit. Any additional work may lead to changes in the recovery curves used for this study, and more advanced studies may identify other ways to further enhance recovery.
- Additional assay of all available materials currently in storage to create a silver resource model. The addition of silver to the resource may contribute positively to the economic model.
- Ongoing lithogeochemical and petrologic studies of existing material will lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms of mineralization and controls on the distribution of gold within the rocks present. This will enable Otis geologists to develop a full paragenesis of the deposit within both the volcanic and sedimentary host rock sequences.
Alan Roberts, VP Exploration, states, “This study has shown that Kilgore’s compact nature, that is the gold ounces occur within a single cohesive and contiguous body of mineralization, is potentially economically viable and amenable to open pit, heap leach mine operation. Continued exploration through drilling combined with ongoing surface investigations may extend the known resources and will improve our understanding of the deposit; this in turn can be applied to further enhancing the economics of the existing deposit, and to ongoing regional exploration for additional deposits at Kilgore and in similar geologic settings in eastern Idaho.”
Future Plans
Otis Gold is committed to a program of continuing to address key development requirements and advance the project while further demonstrating economic viability in the most efficient way possible through:
- Continued drilling to address potential resource conversion, possible additions to the resource through drilling adjacent to the existing resource and drilling of superjacent surficial deposits, and testing of new targets;
- Metallurgical testing to better understand the leach characteristics of the deposit and differences in grade between core and reverse circulation drilling;
- Revised resource model to include both gold and silver that requires additional silver assay from stored materials;
- Geochemical characterization of waste rock; and
- Further baseline environmental and engineering studies.
The Company's August 14, 2018, mineral resource estimate formed the original basis for the PEA (see Otis news releases dated September 28, 2018).
Table 10: Resource Estimate for the Kilgore Project, Clark County, Idaho, U.S.A
| Indicated | Inferred | |||||
| Tonnes (1,000s) | Grade Au (g/T) | Ounces Au (1,000s) | Tonnes (1,000s) | Grade Au (g/T) | Ounces Au (1,000s) | |
| Resource* | 44,600 | 0.58 | 825 | 9,400 | 0.45 | 136 |
Mineral resources have been classified in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources.
Gold resources are reported above a 0.21 g/T Au (0.006 opt) cutoff.
Mineral resources reported here are constrained within an optimized pit shell.
Pit shell input parameters: Gold price $1,300, Selling price $2.20/oz, Recovery 80%, Mining cost $2/ton, Process cost + G&A
$4/ton, Pit slope 50°.
* Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resources estimated will be converted into mineral reserves. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by changes in environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing or other relevant issues that may arise subsequent to the effective date. The Canadian Institute of Mining definitions were followed for the classification of indicated and inferred mineral resources. The quantity and grade of reported inferred mineral resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these inferred mineral resources as an indicated mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an indicated mineral resource category. All figures have been rounded to reflect the relative precision of the estimates. Mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.21 g/T gold based on $1,300 per troy ounce gold and gold metallurgical recoveries on a sliding scale by grade.
Qualified Persons
David Rowe, CPG, Terre Lane, Registered Member of SME (#4053005), Jeffrey Todd Harvey, PhD and Registered Member of SME (#04144120), and JJ Brown, P.G. and Registered Member of SME (#4168244RM), are Qualified Persons under the Instrument (Form 43-101F1, and Companion Policy 43-101CP). Mr. Rowe and JJ Brown conducted independent site visits to the Kilgore property on August 9th through 14th, 2017 and August 4th through 5th, 2018, respectively. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on information available as of March 31, 2019.
Alan Roberts, MSc, CPG (AIPG: CPG#11260), Vice President of Exploration, serves as the Qualified Person for this news release and has reviewed and approved the technical content contained herein.
About the Kilgore Project
The Kilgore Project lies on the north-eastern margin of the Miocene-Pliocene Kilgore Caldera complex in the Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho. The Kilgore Project contains the Kilgore Deposit with a current NI 43-101 resource: Indicated Resource of 825,000 ounces Au in 44.6 million tonnes at a grade of 0.58 g/T Au and an Inferred Resource of 136,000 ounces Au in 9.4 million tonnes at a grade of 0.45 g/T Au (the “Deposit”). The Kilgore Deposit is a low-sulphidation, gold bearing, quartz-adularia epithermal system hosted in Tertiary volcanic rocks, local Tertiary intrusive rocks, and basement Late Cretaceous, Aspen Formation sedimentary rocks.
About the Company
Otis is a resource company focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of precious metal deposits in Idaho, USA. Otis is currently developing its flagship property, the Kilgore Project, located in Clark County, Idaho and the Oakley Project, located in Cassia County, Idaho.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
“Craig T. Lindsay”
President & CEO
For additional information, please contact:
Mr. Tony Perri – Corporate Development
Tel: (604) 424-8100 Email: tony@otisgold.com
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as defined in the policies of the
TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
All statements in this press release, other than statements of historical fact, are "forward-looking information" with respect to Otis Gold within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements that address potential quantity and/or grade of minerals, potential size and expansion of a mineralized zone, proposed timing of exploration and development plans, expected capital costs at Kilgore, expected gold and silver recoveries from the Kilgore, mineralized material, potential additions to the resource through additional drill testing, potential upgrade of inferred mineral resources to measured and indicated mineral resources, the potential for silver resources and intentions to pursue a silver resource study and beliefs regarding gold resources being contained within a larger property area. Forward-looking information is often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as "seek", "anticipate", "plan", "continue", "planned", "expect", "project", "predict", "potential", "targeting", "intends", "believe", "potential", and similar expressions, or describes a "goal", or variation of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "should", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward-looking information is not a guarantee of future performance and is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions of management at the date the statements are made including, among others, assumptions about future prices of gold, and other metal prices, currency exchange rates and interest rates, favourable operating conditions, political stability, obtaining governmental approvals and financing on time, obtaining renewals for existing licenses and permits and obtaining required licenses and permits, labour stability, stability in market conditions, availability of equipment, accuracy of any mineral resources, the availability of drill rigs, the accuracy of a preliminary economic assessment, successful resolution of disputes and anticipated costs and expenditures. Many assumptions are based on factors and events that are not within the control of Otis Gold and there is no assurance they will prove to be correct.
Such forward-looking information, involves known and unknown risks, which may cause the actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including, risks related to the interpretation of results and/or the reliance on technical information provided by third parties as related to the Company’s mineral property interests; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; current economic conditions; future prices of commodities; possible variations in grade or recovery rates; the costs and timing of the development of new deposits; failure of equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; the failure of contracted parties to perform; the timing and success of exploration activities generally; delays in permitting; possible claims against the Company; labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals, financing or in the completion of exploration.
The mineral resource estimates referenced in this press release use the terms "Indicated Mineral Resources" and "Inferred Mineral Resources." While these terms are defined in and required by Canadian regulations (under NI 43-101), these terms are not recognized by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). "Inferred Mineral Resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. The SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant "reserves" as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. Otis Gold is not an SEC registered company.
Although Otis Gold has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Otis Gold disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise unless required by law.